Sometimes the more things change, the more they stay the same. Businesses are migrating from traditional on-premises maintenance of their hardware and software to software-as-a-service (SaaS) and cloud at record levels. But any evaluation of such a move must include more than just the obvious costs of hardware and software. When migrating security to the cloud, the most critical consideration is the total cost of ownership (TCO).

Measuring Total Cost of Ownership

TCO is one of the key measures for evaluating a move from on-premises solutions to SaaS. But what does it include? It’s important to understand the upfront cost of hardware and software as a capital expenditure versus the operational expenditure of the ongoing cost of a subscription. Typically, a TCO is measured over three or five years. For noncritical infrastructure, this calculation can often be a straightforward evaluation of the cost to purchase and maintain versus the cost of the subscription.

Before a TCO analysis is complete, however, it’s important to examine a wider set of criteria that includes tangible and intangible factors. Any migration of critical infrastructure to the cloud, including security infrastructure, must account for a more complete TCO.

The Promise of SaaS

The typical SaaS value proposition is driven by the promise of a reduction of capital expenditures in exchange for predictable, scalable subscription costs.

On-premises costs can include:

  • Procuring and deploying servers and other hardware, storage devices and network infrastructure, including routers and switches;
  • Managing the data center facilities, including generators, power and cooling infrastructure, and physical security, such as cameras and devices on which the associated video is stored; and
  • Managing operations, which typically includes maintaining a network operations center, a ticketing system and associated dashboards.

When using SaaS, organizations can expect to reduce and, in most cases, eliminate many of these upfront costs and the ongoing cost of maintenance.

Identifying the Intangible Costs of On-Premises

In addition to the tangible costs, other costs must be factored into a true TCO calculation for maintaining critical infrastructure. This includes the costs of:

  • Deploying the supporting security infrastructure, such as firewalls and intrusion detection system (IDS) or intrusion prevention system (IPS) devices;
  • Complying with regulatory mandates and supporting the ongoing upkeep of these certifications;
  • Staffing and training to maintain the complex infrastructure;
  • Contracting and procuring hardware, software and associated licenses;
  • Managing server downtime and launch windows associated with applying patches and upgrades to avoid diminished productivity; and
  • Establishing and maintaining disaster recovery and backups, including both hardware and software.

A discussion on intangible costs would be incomplete without also considering opportunity costs. Companies must assess where their IT time is best allocated. Work time is ideally spent on activities tied directly to revenue generation and increasing shareholder value. As the link between work time and revenue generation becomes more attenuated, companies must consider whether less is more when it comes to time spent on the intangible costs of on-premises installations.

The Benefits of Migrating Security to the Cloud

Using the example of IBM QRadar on Cloud, which is security information and event management (SIEM) delivered as a service, it is easy to see the immediate benefits of migrating one critical piece of security infrastructure to the cloud.

With SIEM deployed as a service, companies get a team of security experts to monitor and manage the infrastructure on their behalf. Patches, upgrades and new features are rolled out when available so that companies can stay up to date on new security threats. Resiliency and redundancy is fully managed to enable enterprises to grow elastically, according but not limited to their current needs. This means they can get up and running quickly and realize the benefits of the service immediately to ensure that they meet their goals for future growth.

SaaS enables organizations to reduce organizational and system complexity by entrusting parts of their critical workloads to partners. By moving these critical functions, companies can transfer risks to partners and manage them through contracted terms and service-level agreements. Migrating security to the cloud also allows them to move away from legacy systems, either incrementally or all at once.

The More Things Change…

Migrating to SaaS does not, by any means, eradicate all responsibilities. Ensuring a successful SaaS deployment, for example, means testing to ensure that the services interoperate with existing on-premises tools. There’s also regression testing to ensure proper integration, customizing or retrofitting existing tools, and training or retooling staff so the organization can take advantage of new features and functionalities. At the end of the day, this may require a shift in the way the organization looks at information life cycle management.

Moving beyond the management of legacy infrastructure can lead to an increase in employee effectiveness — and additional free time for them to innovate and engage in more productive work within your organization. Whether deploying on-premises or in the cloud, how you handle information systems security and the TCO of these systems remains a critical part of the analysis.

Download the Nucleus Research Guidebook: IBM QRadar on Cloud

More from Intelligence & Analytics

Hive0051’s large scale malicious operations enabled by synchronized multi-channel DNS fluxing

12 min read - For the last year and a half, IBM X-Force has actively monitored the evolution of Hive0051’s malware capabilities. This Russian threat actor has accelerated its development efforts to support expanding operations since the onset of the Ukraine conflict. Recent analysis identified three key changes to capabilities: an improved multi-channel approach to DNS fluxing, obfuscated multi-stage scripts, and the use of fileless PowerShell variants of the Gamma malware. As of October 2023, IBM X-Force has also observed a significant increase in…

Email campaigns leverage updated DBatLoader to deliver RATs, stealers

11 min read - IBM X-Force has identified new capabilities in DBatLoader malware samples delivered in recent email campaigns, signaling a heightened risk of infection from commodity malware families associated with DBatLoader activity. X-Force has observed nearly two dozen email campaigns since late June leveraging the updated DBatLoader loader to deliver payloads such as Remcos, Warzone, Formbook, and AgentTesla. DBatLoader malware has been used since 2020 by cybercriminals to install commodity malware remote access Trojans (RATs) and infostealers, primarily via malicious spam (malspam). DBatLoader…

New Hive0117 phishing campaign imitates conscription summons to deliver DarkWatchman malware

8 min read - IBM X-Force uncovered a new phishing campaign likely conducted by Hive0117 delivering the fileless malware DarkWatchman, directed at individuals associated with major energy, finance, transport, and software security industries based in Russia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, and Estonia. DarkWatchman malware is capable of keylogging, collecting system information, and deploying secondary payloads. Imitating official correspondence from the Russian government in phishing emails aligns with previous Hive0117 campaigns delivering DarkWatchman malware, and shows a possible significant effort to induce a sense of urgency as…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today